GMOs & Biotechnology


Home
Food Law
General References
Food Labeling
Food Law News
Food Safety
Dietary Supplements
GMOs & Biotechnology
Imports, COOL
Global Food University
Security & Bioterrorism
Internet Courses
Other Issues
Contact Information
Legal Notices

Websites

AgBios http://www.agbios.com/articles.php

AgBiosafety, University of Nebraska - Lincoln  http://agbiosafety.unl.edu/

Agricultural Biotechnology, USDA http://www.usda.gov/agencies/biotech/index.html

Annotated List of Sites Related to Agricultural/Environmental Biotechnology  http://www.isb.vt.edu/cfdocs/indexlinks.cfm
Download listing: http://www.isb.vt.edu/isb_links.html
Regulatory Information: http://www.isb.vt.edu/2002menu/regulatory_information.cfm

Biotechnology, Food Safety Department, World Health Organization http://www.who.int/foodsafety/biotech/en/  

Biotech Food Safety Assessment
University of California, Davis
http://sbc.ucdavis.edu/outreach/resource/gm_food_safety.htm

Biotech Bulletins by Agrifood Awareness Australia, Limited, is an industry initiative, established to increase public awareness of, and encourage informed debate about gene technology.  http://www.afaa.com.au/mfs.asp?C=nav3.htm&M=biotech.asp&T=title

Biotechnology Assessment Project
National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy http://www.ncfap.org/biotech.htm

Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee
http://cbac-cccb.ca/epic/internet/incbac-cccb.nsf/en/Home

Checkbiotech.org Website sponsored by the agribusiness Syngenta.  http://www.checkbiotech.org/root/index.cfm

Foods Derived from Modern Biotechnology Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization http://www.euro.who.int/foodsafety/Otherissues/20020402_4

foodfuture, The UK Food and Drink Federation's website.  http://www.foodfuture.org.uk/ 

Global GM Food Labelling Laws, Agrifood Awareness Australia Limited’s (AFAA) Biotech Bulletin.  http://www.afaa.com.au/mfs.asp?C=nav3.htm&M=biotech.asp&T=title

Maps indicating GMO production and restriction status available at  http://www.ifg.org/pdf/gmoworld.pdf  and http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/pubs/Worldwide%20GM%20Regulations%2011.2005.pdf.

Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology
The Pew initiative on Food and Biotechnology is a project of the University of Richmond, Virginia, and is funded by The Pew Charitable Trusts. 
http://pewagbiotech.org/

Physicians and Scientists for Responsible Application of Science and Technology (PRAST)
http://www.psrast.org/intropage.htm

SCOPE research group Science Controversies On-line Partnerships in Education (SCOPE) http://scope.educ.washington.edu/gmfood/index.php

Waiter there's a gene in my food
Australian Broadcasting Corporation 
http://www.abc.net.au/science/slab/consconf/default.htm

Reports

20 Questions on Genetically Modified Foods  Food Safety Department, World Health Organization http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/biotech/20questions/en/

Biotechnology Questions and Answers Center for Consumer Research, University of California, Davis http://ccr.ucdavis.edu/biot/index.html

Codex Principles and Guidelines on Foods Derived from Biotechnology ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/standard/en/CodexTextsBiotechFoods.pdf

GAO, Genetically Modified Foods: Experts View Regimen of Safety Tests as Adequate, but FDA's Evaluation Process Could Be Enhanced. GAO-02-566  (May 23, 2002) Abstract

Safety of Genetically Modified Foods Produced Through Biotechnology Society of Toxicology  (September 25, 2002) http://www.toxicology.org/information/GovernmentMedia/GM_Food.html

Transgenic Plants and World Agriculture
Royal Society of London, the US National Academy of Sciences, the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Indian National Science Academy, the Mexican Academy of Sciences and the Third World Academy of Sciences.  http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9889.html (2000)

Biotech regulation falls short, report says: Pew study call for better oversight
Justin Gillis, The Washington Post (04/01/04)  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40595-2004Mar31.html  As the biotech industry produces more genetically engineered products, existing federal law may be inadequate to assure the products’ safety, according to a report released today by the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology, a Washington think tank.  “The regulatory system isn’t broken, but it is showing signs of wear and tear,” said Michael Rodemeyer, executive director of the Pew Initiative.  The Pew report is available at http://pewagbiotech.org/

SOFA: The State of Food and Agriculture 2003-04, FAO, explores the potential of agricultural biotechnology - especially transgenic crops - to meet the needs of the poor.  The report presents an analysis of the socio-economic impacts of technological change in agriculture and surveys the current evidence regarding the safety of transgenic crops for human health and the environment. It recommends targeted investments in agricultural research, extension, and regulatory capacity to ensure that the potential of agricultural biotechnology is brought to bear on the needs of the poor. Agricultural biotechnology has the potential to significantly improve standards of living in poor nations, but thus far only a few developing countries are enjoying those benefits.  "Other barriers that prevent the poor from accessing and fully benefiting from modern biotechnology include inadequate regulatory procedures, complex intellectual property issues, poorly functioning markets and seed delivery systems, and weak domestic plant breeding capacity."  The complete report is available online ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/006/Y5160e/Y5160e00.pdf

Issues in the Regulation of Genetically Engineered Plants and Animals,
Pew Initiative in Biotechnology, available at:
http://pewagbiotech.org/research/regulation/Regulation.pdf
Executive summary available at: http://pewagbiotech.org/research/regulation/RegulationExecSum.pdf

Genetically Modified Pest-Protected Plants: Science and Regulation—Report on the U.S. biotech regulatory system, National Academy of Sciences available at: http://www.nap.edu/books/0309069300/html/.

Are Europe's labeling laws for genetically modified foods cost-effective, or even necessary? Another Look at Biotech Regulation, Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes, Regulation Magazine: Vol. 27, No. 1 (Spring 2004) available at:  http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv27n1/v27n1-5.pdf 

Travesties of Regulation, Harmful U.N. policies [biotechnology]
Henry I. Miller (Hoover Institute research fellow) & Gregory Conko (February 15, 2005) http://www.nationalreview.com/script/printpage.asp?ref=/comment/henrymiller200502150749.asp

Agricultural Biotechnology: Why Do Europeans Have Difficulty Accepting It?
B. Zechendorf, AgBioForum, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1998) http://www.agbioforum.org/v1n1/v1n1a03-zechen.htm

GMOS AND BIOSAFETY: A BACKGROUND PAPER FOR DECISION-MAKERS
The World Conservation Union - IUCN (August 2004).  A review of the controversy surrounding GMOs, including scientific, economic, policy, and socio-cultural issues, as well as crosscutting principles and the institutional framework and offers a series of recommendations on decision-making.  http://www.iucn.org/themes/law/pdfdocuments/GMO_English.pdf 

FDA Proposes Draft Guidance for Industry for New Plant Varieties Intended for Food Use
FDA Talk Paper T04-52 (November 19, 2004) available at: http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2004/ANS01327.html.

Recommendations for the Early Food Safety Evaluation of New Non-Pesticidal Proteins Produced by New Plant Varieties Intended for Food Use DRAFT GUIDANCE
FDA, CFSAN/Office of Food Additive Safety (November 2004)
http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/bioprgui.html.

Notice of Draft Guidance for Industry: Recommendations for the Early Food Safety Evaluation of New Non-Pesticidal Proteins Produced by New Plant Varieties Intended for Food Use
69 Federal Register 68381-68383 (November 24, 2004). Written comments on the draft guidance may be submitted up to 60 days from the date it is published in the Federal Register. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/fr041124.html.

Why We Need Labelling of Genetically Engineered Food, Consumers International http://www.consumersinternational.org/documents_asp/searchdocument.asp?DocID=583&regionid=135&langid=1#  

EU Q & A’s on GMOs
An updated version of the European Commission's Questions and Answers on the regulation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the EU is available. It gives an overview of the legislation and then answers questions on the procedures for the experimental release of GMOs into the environment and for authorizing the placement of GMOs on the market. http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/food/biotechnology/gmfood/qanda_en.htm     

Americans and GM Food: Knowledge, Opinion & Interest in 2004, W. Hallman, W. Hebden, C. Cuite, H. Aquino, and J. Lang. http://www.foodpolicyinstitute.org/docs/reports/NationalStudy2004.pdf  

Expertise, Trust, and Communication about Food Biotechnology, J. Lang, K. O'Neill, and W. Hallman. Agbioforum 6:4  http://www.agbioforum.org/v6n4/v6n4a06-lang.htm

Environmental Issues

Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants: The Scope and Adequacy of Regulation, Committee on Environmental Impacts Associated with Commercialization of Transgenic Plants, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, National Research Council.  National Academies Press (2002)  http://books.nap.edu/catalog/10258.html

Genetically Engineered Organisms and the Environment: Current Status and Recommendations
Ecological Society of America (February 26, 2004)
“In summary, we urge scientifically-based assessment of the benefits and risks of GEOs that are proposed for release into the environment, and scientifically-based monitoring and management for environmental effects that may occur over large spatial scales and long time frames.  GEOs that are phenotypically similar to conventionally bred organisms raise few new environmental concerns, but many novel types of GEOs are being considered for future development.  These include baculoviruses that are engineered for more effective biological control, microorganisms that promote carbon storage, fast-growing fish, and fast-growing plants that tolerate cold, drought, or salinity.”
http://www.esa.org/pao/esaPositions/Papers/geo_position.htm

Precautionary Principle

EU View Of Precautionary Principle in Food Safety http://www.eurunion.org/News/speeches/2003/031023tvdh.htm

Comparing Precaution in the United States and Europe, Jonathan B. Wiener and Michael D. Rogers, Journal of Risk Research – revised 26 April 2002 http://www.env.duke.edu/solutions/documents/wp01.pdf

Precautionary Principle, Communication from the Commission, Commission of the European Communities (Feb. 2, 2000) http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf

The Perils of the Precautionary Principle: Lessons from the American and European Experience http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/hl818.cfm

“Substantial Equivalence” and the Precautionary Principle: A Challenge To Risk Assessment, Andrew Apel, AgBiotech Reporter http://www.biotech-info.net/risk_assessment_challenge.html.

Precautionary Principle Background Reading

News

FDA Proposes Draft Guidance for Industry for New Plant Varieties Intended for Food Use
FDA Talk Paper T04-52 (November 19, 2004) available at: http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2004/ANS01327.html.

Recommendations for the Early Food Safety Evaluation of New Non-Pesticidal Proteins Produced by New Plant Varieties Intended for Food Use DRAFT GUIDANCE
FDA, CFSAN/Office of Food Additive Safety (November 2004)
http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/bioprgui.html.

Notice of Draft Guidance for Industry: Recommendations for the Early Food Safety Evaluation of New Non-Pesticidal Proteins Produced by New Plant Varieties Intended for Food Use
69 Federal Register 68381-68383 (November 24, 2004) http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/fr041124.html.

Guidance On Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New Plant Varieties,  FDA, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (October 1997) http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/consulpr.html.

Harvest of Fear, Nova/Frontline Special Report (on the controversy over GM crops) http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/harvest/

Should We Grow GM Crops? http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/harvest/exist/

Mutant Food, Kristi Coale, Salon.com article (the story of a lawsuit filed in the late 1990s against the FDA, which turned up FDA documents revealing that some of the agency's scientists have doubts about the safety of GM food) http://dir.salon.com/news/feature/2000/01/12/food/index.html.

Who’s Afraid?, Economist (An op-ed article summarizing both sides of the GM food issue) (Jun 17, 1999) http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=213459&CFID=1168845&CFTOKEN=11141195

Pandora’s Pantry, Jon R. Luoma, Mother Jones (January/February 2000) (A story on the government's rush to approve GM foods, and the questions many feel were left unanswered.) http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2000/01/pandora.html.

Consumer advocates urge Codex to accept labeling of GM foods
Press Release, Consumers International (5/10/2004)
Consumers International (CI) will strongly endorse the labeling of genetically modified (GM) foods at the Codex Alimentarius Committee on Food Labelling in Montreal from 10-14 May. Julian Edwards, CI’s Director-General comments: 'For ten years the Committee has been procrastinating on this issue. A small group of governments, led by the US, refuse to recognise that responding to consumer interests is the main purpose the Codex committee should be serving.'  http://www.consumersinternational.org/news/display.asp?regionid=135&tag=C&id=367&type=news&cat=465&langid=1

  Back to Top


Home | Food Law | General References | Food Labeling | Food Law News | Food Safety | Dietary Supplements | GMOs & Biotechnology | Imports, COOL | Global Food University | Security & Bioterrorism | Internet Courses | Other Issues | Contact Information | Legal Notices

LEGAL NOTICES - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice.

 Copyright © 2003-2008 Neal D. Fortin